-
Grid-forming batteries
Grid-forming batteries are the largest group. Some stand alone. Others sit alongside a solar or wind plant, where the battery forms the grid and the renewable plant follows it. For a new battery, grid-forming is mostly a matter of how the inverter is controlled, so the equipment costs little more than a battery without this capability. The larger cost so far has been implementation time. Because the technology was new, several projects faced more testing and longer approvals than conventional grid-following batteries. Some therefore started operating in grid-following mode and enabled grid-forming later. Adding the grid-forming capability to a battery that is already running usually means going back through the connection and study process. The equipment may be unchanged, but the plant behaves differently once the new control mode is enabled.
Whether a new battery uses grid-following or grid-forming controls is usually determined by connection rules or market incentives. Some system operators now require grid-forming control for all new batteries. Others procure stability services through market mechanisms where grid-forming batteries can participate. A third approach is to apply system strength charges to grid-following inverter-based resources, including batteries. These charges can be avoided by making a new battery grid-forming or co-locating a grid-forming battery alongside grid-following inverter-based resources, such as wind or solar. None of these approaches means every new connection has to be grid-forming. What a system needs depends on where it is weak and what is already connected, so requirements and charges are shaped accordingly. Grid-forming batteries also earn from energy and reserve markets, giving them a business case beyond their stability services.
Batteries at large load facilities such as data centres are an exception as they are not necessarily grid-forming. Data centres rely on UPS systems to ride through grid disturbances, with diesel generators for backup and batteries emerging alongside them. This capacity sits idle most of the time, and its capability to support the grid is starting to be explored. Operators are cautious, however, about anything that puts secure operation at risk. Rules are also changing, with requirements on ride-through, ramp rates and peak shaving at moments of grid stress. Genuinely grid-forming operation from batteries at large loads is being explored but has not been used at scale.
-
Grid-forming STATCOMs
Grid-forming STATCOMs are network devices built only to provide power system stability. Any STATCOM holds voltage steady, and with added short-term energy storage it can help with frequency too. Grid-forming control lets it set voltage rather than react to it, which is what makes it effective in a weak grid. A grid-forming STATCOM stores only enough energy to ride through a disturbance, not enough to buy and sell on a market the way a battery does, so its whole business case rests on the stability service it provides. That means it gets built where someone is paying for stability, either a network company investing in its own system or a system operator buying the service.
-
Grid-forming HVDC links
Grid-forming HVDC links use the same hardware as any other HVDC link but are controlled differently. Any HVDC link carries power over long distances or between systems that are not synchronised with each other and needs converter stations at both ends. Grid-forming control lets those converters set voltage and frequency rather than follow them, so the link supports stability as well as moving power. This applies whether the link connects two systems, runs point-to-point over a long distance, or brings offshore wind ashore. An HVDC link is a large investment made for reasons of distance or connection, not for stability, so the decision belongs to transmission planning. Where a link is being built anyway, converters that can also support the grid add little to the cost. That changes if both ends need to provide stability services, because then a storage buffer is needed.
-
Grid-forming renewable plants
Grid-forming renewable plants can set voltage and frequency through their own inverters, rather than relying on a separate device. This group covers first demonstrations on wind and solar, and on converter-connected pumped storage.
For wind and solar, the cost of grid-forming is mainly in the energy rather than the equipment. Without storage, a plant must hold back some available output to keep a reserve, creating an ongoing opportunity cost. This is the main reason most wind and solar plants still follow the grid even though the control technology exists. For wind, operating away from the optimal point can also increase mechanical stress and wear on the blades, drivetrain and tower. These costs can change where markets pay for the reserve, connection rules require it, or where a battery on the same site can provide the service instead.
Pumped storage has always been able to form the grid because its synchronous machines hold voltage and frequency like coal or gas generators. It also has energy in reserve in the upper reservoir, unlike wind and solar. What is new is variable speed pumped storage: its machines connect through converters, which decouple them from grid frequency and let it adjust power while pumping. However, it also means the machines no longer holds the grid up by itself. Grid-forming control has to be built into the converter deliberately. The projects here demonstrate that converter-connected pumped storage can form the grid too.
-
Synchronous machines
Synchronous machines still play a role in power systems with high shares of inverter-based resources, in new forms. Some are purpose-built synchronous condensers, and some of those have a flywheel added to store extra rotational energy and provide frequency support as needed. Others are generators from retired coal plants that are modified to spin without fuel. And some are gas turbines fitted with a clutch, so the generator can keep turning and supporting the grid while the turbine is shut down. What sets all of them apart is fault current. When a line is damaged, protection equipment needs a large surge of current to detect the fault and switch it off, and a spinning machine delivers far more of that surge than an inverter can, whatever the inverter's controls.
These are mechanical machines, so cost works differently. A clutch must be designed in from the start and is difficult to retrofit, making it mainly an option for plants being built now. A purpose-built synchronous condenser is bought for stability alone, like a STATCOM, so it needs a clear source of payment for the service. Converting generators at retired plants can be faster and cheaper than building new machines, but only where suitable generators remain, the site needs stability support, and conversion costs are competitive with a new condenser.
How modern grids stay stable: a global project showcase
Grid-forming and other stability projects from around the world, showcasing real-world experiences and lessons for power system planning
Key takeaways
- Power systems can stay stable as wind, solar and battery storage replace conventional plants. System services such as inertia and voltage support used to come mainly from large spinning machines. Today, they can – and increasingly do – come from other technologies, connected to the grid through power electronics. As inverter-based resources become a larger part of the system, the grid also responds faster, and voltage and frequency can be more sensitive to changes in power flows, making it critical to have the right combination of stability technologies in place. This is one of the central engineering questions of the energy transition, and it is already being answered in real power systems.
- There are several technology pathways, rather than one single solution. Grid-forming controls allow batteries, solar and wind to set the grid's voltage and frequency instead of following them. The same controls are being applied to network devices such as STATCOMs and to the converter stations at each end of an HVDC link. Pumped storage has always formed the grid, but newer variable-speed units connect through converters and therefore need grid-forming controls to do so. Synchronous machines provide these services inherently through their physics. They are also appearing in new forms, including generators recovered from retired coal plants and gas turbines fitted with clutches so they can support the grid without burning fuel.
- Deployment of grid-forming solutions is already underway, but still at an early enough stage for each project to provide valuable lessons. The projects featured here range from small pilots to batteries of several hundred megawatts, and several have already proved themselves in real system events. Not every system needs these solutions yet. Each card explains what made them necessary in the system where they were built. Powe systems are changing quickly, so technologies that are not needed today can become urgent within a few years.
- Policy determines whether and how these technologies are used. Behind most projects featured here is a connection requirement, a tender or a market rule. Some system operators now buy stability as a service. Others require grid-forming control when a new battery connects, although these requirements are generally targeted at the parts of the system that need them rather than applied to every connection. Policy has usually followed system needs rather than anticipated it. As a result, the systems that changed fastest have often been the first to act. As rules and procurement mechanisms catch up with what these technologies can do, such demonstrations become normal practice.
Who this showcase is for
This page is for policymakers, regulators and system planners. It explains grid stability without assuming a technical background, and terms are explained where they appear. Each project card shows what problem the system faced, what was built, why that solution was chosen and what can be learned from it. The aim is to help users judge what is relevant for different situations. The showcase does not suggest that every grid needs these specific solutions now.
How the projects were chosen
The selection of projects in this showcase is explicitly about projects rather than companies. The number of projects using these newer stability solutions is still small enough to examine individually. This showcase is not intended to be an exhaustive inventory; instead, it brings together around 30 projects across 12 countries and multiple regions, to illustrate different technology solutions, system conditions, applications and regulatory and market contexts. Each project adds something distinctive – from a first deployment or new technology to a scale-up or different system context. The selections draws on ESIG's Grid-Forming Landscape database and other public sources, with consideration given to ensure the information is not weighted towards systems that publish more frequently than others. The manufacturer named on each card is the supplier of the inverters or the machine that provides the grid-forming capability, not the developer, owner or contractor. All content was developed together with ESIG and technically reviewed.
Five technology groups
The cards in this showcase are colour-coded into five technology groups. Four use inverters to connect to the grid; the fifth uses rotating machines.
Stability solution project cards
Hornsdale Power Reserve
System operator:
AEMO
Manufacturer:
Tesla Energy
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- One of the world's highest wind and solar shares
- Low inertia
- Need for faster frequency control ancillary services (FCAS)
- Low system strength
- Transmission congestion
Enabling incentives
- Fast FCAS market
- South Australian Government funding (Department of Energy and Mining)
- ARENA Advancing Renewables Programme
Hornsdale Power Reserve
Additional background and problem context
South Australia has one of the world’s highest shares of wind and solar. As synchronous generators retired or ran less during windy, sunny periods, inertia and system strength reduced with them. AEMO needed new sources of stability. Hornsdale, an existing 150 MW battery, was an obvious place to test whether an inverter could do the stabilising job of a spinning machine.
Solution mechanism
Hornsdale was already operating when its inverters were upgraded from grid-following to grid-forming, without new hardware. It now runs below about half its rated power most of the time, to keep headroom for the stability services it is contracted to provide. The battery can:
- Set the grid’s voltage and frequency, does not need a grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine
- Deliver FFR
- Improve system strength
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- First deployment of Tesla’s grid-forming control mode
- Stable inertia-like response and FFR confirmed
- Outperforms grid-following control in weak grids
- Regulatory requirements capped inertia-like response at 2,070 MWs of a possible 3,000
- Stability services free up transmission capacity
Dalrymple ESCRI Battery
System operator:
AEMO
Manufacturer:
Hitachi Energy
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- A single line, so an outage cuts the whole peninsula
- Low system strength
- Loss of supply from transmission outages
- Low inertia
- Frequency instability
Enabling incentives
- ARENA grant for grid-forming demonstration
- Reliability obligations on ElectraNet, the network owner
- Need for non-wires network solutions
Dalrymple ESCRI Battery
Additional background and problem context
The lower Yorke Peninsula is supplied by a single transmission line, so an outage on that line cuts supply to the whole region. There is also local wind and solar, including the 90 MW Wattle Point wind farm. The usual fix would be to reinforce the network or to add a synchronous machine. Instead, a battery was installed to hold this part of the grid up on its own when the line goes down.
Solution mechanism
When the transmission line goes down, the battery keeps the peninsula running on its own, with no synchronous generation. It is deliberately short duration, sized for network support rather than energy trading, so it has a lot of power relative to its storage. It can:
- Set the grid’s voltage and frequency, does not need a grid reference to keep running
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine
- Improve system strength
- Provide FCAS
- Support restoration after a blackout on the peninsula
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- Kept the peninsula supplied while disconnected from the main grid, switching in and out of islanded operation without interruption
- First utility-scale battery to demonstrate continuous grid-forming operation in a transmission network
- Validates grid-forming batteries as providers of inertia and system strength
- Multiple real disturbances confirmed stable operation in weak-grid and islanded conditions
Mackinac Back-to-Back HVDC Converter Station
System operator:
MISO
Manufacturer:
Hitachi Energy
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Need for controllable power flow
- Transmission congestion
- Low system strength
- Voltage stability limits
- Upper Peninsula reliability concerns
- Renewable integration constraints
Enabling incentives
- Transmission expansion programme
- VSC-HVDC technology maturity
Mackinac Back-to-Back HVDC Converter Station
Additional background and problem context
The eastern part of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula is fed through undersea cables across the Straits of Mackinac. As wind generation grew further west, power pushed east and overloaded those cables. ATC often had to split its system in two to cope. This converter station was built to control that flow. On the Upper Peninsula side, it runs grid-forming controls, with the stronger Lower Peninsula grid behind it acting as a buffer.
Solution mechanism
The station converts the power to direct current and back again, which breaks the synchronous connection between the two sides and lets the operator dictate the flow. It can:
- Control exactly how much power flows, and which way
- Control voltage independently of that power flow
- Deliver dynamic voltage support
- Damp power oscillations
- Operate stably when the Upper Peninsula’s grid is weak
- Form and sustain an electrical island on the Upper Peninsula
- Support restoration after a blackout on the Upper Peninsula
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- First transmission-scale VSC back-to-back HVDC project
- Facilitates integration of wind and solar in northern Michigan
- An early forerunner of grid-forming, built before the term was in common use
Blackhillock
System operator:
NESO
Manufacturer:
SMA
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
Wind connects through converters, not machines
- Scotland’s coal-fired power plants have closed
- Stability had never been bought on its own
- Low inertia
- Low system strength
Enabling incentives
- NESO Stability Pathfinder programme
Blackhillock
Additional background and problem context
Scotland has some of the highest concentrations of wind generation in Europe. Wind connects through converters, which normally follow the grid rather than hold it up. The coal plants that did hold it up have closed. Now NESO buys stability through competitive tenders. Blackhillock was built to sell those services rather than energy.
Solution mechanism
Blackhillock won a long-term contract to supply stability, the first time a battery had been paid for this in Great Britain. It can:
- Set the grid’s voltage and frequency and does not need a grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine
- Improve system strength
- Deliver dynamic voltage support
- In addition to stability supply, it can engage in energy arbitrage and balancing services
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- First large-scale grid-forming battery procured under NESO’s Stability Pathfinder framework
- Has already responded as expected to a real disturbance on the grid
- Shows that a system operator can buy stability from a battery instead of spinning machines
- Supports higher use of Scottish wind, easing the constraints on north-to-south transfers
Bordesholm Battery
System operator:
TenneT
Manufacturer:
SMA
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- The town cannot supply itself if the main grid fails
- Low inertia
- Frequency reserves shrink as thermal plants retire
- Growing wind and solar share in northern Germany
Enabling incentives
- Revenue available in the German FCR market
- Market reforms opening FCR to batteries
- The town wanted to stay supplied during outages
Bordesholm Battery
Additional background and problem context
FCR in Germany has always come from thermal and hydro generators. As those retire, the country needs faster and more accurate ways to hold frequency steady. The town of Bordesholm built a battery to earn revenue in that market. It also does something no German battery had done before, keeping the town supplied on its own when the main grid is not available.
Solution mechanism
Bordesholm battery participates in the frequency market, and can supply the town on its own if the main grid goes down. It can:
- Set the grid’s voltage and frequency, does not need a grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine
- Provide FCR
- Keep the town supplied on its own when the main grid is unavailable
- Support black start
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- Demonstrates that batteries can reliably provide FCR services on a continuous basis
- Switches between grid-connected and islanded operation without interruption
- Improves frequency quality through faster response
- Shows that a battery can earn its keep in the frequency market while also acting as a backup supply for the town it is installed in
Shallow Basket Battery
System operator:
PNM
Manufacturer:
Tesla Energy
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Coal plant retirement
- Low system strength
- Renewable integration
Enabling incentives
- San Juan coal-fired power station retirement
- Need to stably integrate co-located solar PV
Shallow Basket Battery
Additional background and problem context
When the San Juan coal-fired power station closed, PNM lost a major source of voltage support and fault current, while solar and wind kept growing across New Mexico. The developer needed the new solar and battery plant to run stably in a system with declining spinning generation. Late in the design, they decided to make the battery grid-forming.
Solution mechanism
Shallow Basket pairs solar with a battery, and the battery is the part that forms the grid, holding the whole plant steady. It can:
- Set the grid’s voltage and frequency, does not need a grid reference to operate
- Deliver dynamic voltage support
- Improve system strength
- Keep both the solar and the battery connected through grid faults
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- Switching to grid-forming late in the design is feasible, even with control designs nearly complete
- The late switch worried the design and construction teams, and took explaining
- Co-locating solar and battery behind the same generator step-up transformer added complexity
- Where one controller runs both the solar and the battery, its logic has to be designed not to override the battery's automatic grid-forming response
South Fork Offshore Wind
System operator:
NYISO
Manufacturer:
Hitachi Energy
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Long offshore cables meeting a weak onshore grid
- Low system strength
- Voltage stability
- Harmonic instability on long offshore cables
- Voltage spikes when equipment is switched on
Enabling incentives
- Connection requirements for the offshore wind farm
- NYISO system strength needs
South Fork Offshore Wind
Additional background and problem context
South Fork was the first utility-scale offshore wind farm in the United States, bringing 132 MW ashore on Long Island, which has weak connections to the rest of the grid. Long offshore cables meeting a grid like that can cause harmonic instability and voltage spikes at switch-on. The wind farm’s inverters follow the grid rather than setting it, so a separate device was installed to hold the voltage steady.
Solution mechanism
A STATCOM is a stability device on its own, with no generation or storage behind it, so it can support voltage but not frequency. This STATCOM runs grid-forming controls, while the wind farm’s own inverters do not. It can:
- Set the grid’s voltage, rather than following it
- Inject or absorb reactive power within milliseconds
- Improve system strength
- Operate stably where the grid is weak
- Help the grid recover after a fault
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- The first operational transmission-connected grid-forming STATCOM in North America
- Shows that grid-forming does not always need storage behind it, although without stored energy it supports voltage only
Kapolei Energy Storage
System operator:
Hawaiian Electric
Manufacturer:
SMA
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Island grid with no neighbours to import from
- Coal plant retirement
- Low system inertia
- Frequency stability
- Transmission limits force wind and solar off
- Need for black start
Enabling incentives
- Hawaiian Electric renewable procurement
- Hawaii 100% renewable by 2045 mandate
- Long-term utility services contract
Kapolei Energy Storage
Additional background and problem context
Oahu is an island grid with no neighbours to lean on, so when a generator trips, there is nothing to import to replace it. Closing the island’s 180 MW coal plant took away not just power it was producing but the stability that came with it. Hawaiian Electric went looking for a replacement that could do both jobs, and chose a battery built in two parts, one to hold the grid up and one to react fast when frequency moves.
Solution mechanism
The plant totals 185 MW and 565 MWh, split in two parts. A 135 MW grid-forming section sets voltage and frequency, and a separate 50 MW section delivers FFR in grid-following mode. Together they can:
- Set the grid’s voltage and frequency, does not need a grid reference to operate
- Imitate the inertia of a synchronous machine, from the 135 MW grid-forming section
- Deliver FFR from the separate 50 MW section, with full response within 250 milliseconds
- Provide transmission voltage support, shift solar PV output to peak demand and support black start
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- Expected to cut curtailment by about 70% and allow around 10% more wind and solar onto the system
- Responded to real generator trips within about 250 milliseconds
- First large battery brought in to replace the full set of services a thermal plant used to provide
Alpiq Grid-Forming Battery
System operator:
Fingrid
Manufacturer:
Merus Power
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Wind growing fast as conventional plants close
- Low inertia
- Low system strength
- Renewable integration
- Reduced reliance on synchronous generation
Enabling incentives
- Fingrid’s grid-forming battery technical requirements
- Nordic renewable energy growth
Alpiq Grid-Forming Battery
Additional background and problem context
Finland is adding wind quickly while its conventional generation declines. Fingrid moved early to prepare for this. From 2023 it required grid-forming for new batteries in weak parts of the grid, and from 2025 has required all new grid-scale batteries to be grid-forming. Other system operators are moving the same way, with grid-forming requirements now being written into European network rules. The Alpiq battery was one of the first built under this rule.
Solution mechanism
Because grid-forming is a requirement in Finland rather than an option, Alpiq had to demonstrate the full set of capabilities before it could connect. It can:
- Set the grid’s voltage and frequency, does not need a grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine
- Improve system strength
- Improve voltage stability
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- Passed a full programme of modelling, hardware verification, and field testing to prove compliance
- Shows that a battery can meet mandatory grid-forming rules and still trade normally in the market
Darlington Point Energy Storage System
System operator:
AEMO
Manufacturer:
Tesla Energy
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- One of Australia's highest wind and solar concentrations
- Low system strength
- Voltage stability
- Renewable integration; reduced synchronous generation; grid congestion; need for dispatchable flexibility
Enabling incentives
- ARENA Advancing Renewables Programme
- AEMO’s 2023 Voluntary Specification for Grid-forming Inverters
- Transgrid contract for fast-acting voltage control
- NSW renewable energy transition
Darlington Point Energy Storage System
Additional background and problem context
Southwest New South Wales has one of Australia’s highest concentrations of solar and wind, and system strength has fallen as a result. In the early 2020s, developers were wary of grid-forming. It was seen as riskier, harder to get approved, and likely to interfere with trading. Darlington Point was designed to test whether a battery could provide system strength and still operate normally in the market.
Solution mechanism
Darlington Point was one of the first Australian batteries to connect with grid-forming controls under AEMO’s new framework, at a point in the network where system strength was short. It can:
- Set grid’s voltage and frequency, no need for grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine
- Improve system strength and voltage stability, provide FCAS and participate in energy arbitrage
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- Approved in 6 months with only one major revision, establishing the testing and registration pathway later GFM projects adopted. GFM inverters also required a different monitoring method because phase-imbalance correction can falsely trigger plant fault-detection equipment
- Voltage control contracted to Transgrid (transmission network owner) had no discernible effect on market trading, as responses are small, brief and predominantly reactive power. Transgrid estimates service enables 120 MW additional renewable capacity on a constrained network, deferring transmission investment
- When a transmission failure took 2.69 GW offline in February 2024, Darlington Point was offline; an identical GFM battery at the same site responded in under 20 milliseconds
Mehrum E-STATCOM
System operator:
TenneT
Manufacturer:
Siemens Energy
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Sits where two north-south corridors meet
- Low inertia
- Low system strength
- Voltage instability
- Renewable integration
Enabling incentives
- TenneT grid stability programme
- German energy transition (Energiewende)
- Coal phase-out
- High wind and solar penetration
Mehrum E-STATCOM
Additional background and problem context
Germany’s coal and nuclear phase-out is removing the spinning machines that supplied stability services such as inertia, voltage support, and fault current. Mehrum sits where two major north-south transmission corridors meet, carrying growing volumes of wind and solar south. TenneT needed a device that could replace stability services, and do it for frequency as well as voltage.
Solution mechanism
An E-STATCOM is a STATCOM with supercapacitors added. Energy stored in supercapacitors lets it inject short bursts of real power, so unlike a conventional STATCOM it can work on frequency not just voltage. It can:
- Set the grid’s voltage and frequency, does not need a grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine
- Deliver ±200 MW of real power within milliseconds
- Provide ±300 MVAr of reactive power to hold voltage steady
- Improve system strength
- Damp oscillations
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- World’s first STATCOM with supercapacitors, working on both voltage and frequency
- Shows that a device with no generation behind it can still replace inertia from spinning machines
- Validates grid-forming control on a transmission-connected stability device
Kilmarnock South Battery
System operator:
NESO
Manufacturer:
SMA
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Constrained corridor from Scotland to England
- Scottish wind curtailed when the corridor is at capacity
- Little synchronous generation left nearby
- Low inertia
- Low system strength
Enabling incentives
- NESO Stability Pathfinder, Phase 2
Kilmarnock South Battery
Additional background and problem context
Scotland generates far more wind power than it uses, and the surplus flows south to England over a corridor that is often constrained. Kilmarnock sits on that corridor. NESO contracted this battery through Phase 2 of its Stability Pathfinder programme, explicitly buying stability as a service. At 300 MW it is the largest contracted in that phase.
Solution mechanism
At 300 MW, Kilmarnock is the largest battery contracted in Phase 2 of the Stability Pathfinder, and it sits on the corridor that carries Scottish wind south. It can:
- Set the grid’s voltage and frequency, does not need a grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine
- Improve system strength
- Deliver dynamic voltage support
- Participate in energy arbitrage and balancing services
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- Will show whether grid-forming batteries deliver stability at 300 MW
- Should ease the corridor constraints that force Scottish wind to be curtailed, at a cost to consumers
Broken Hill Battery
System operator:
AEMO
Manufacturer:
Fluence / EPC Power
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- 700 km from the nearest major generation
- Low system strength
- Voltage instability
- Sub-synchronous oscillations
- Low inertia
- Renewable integration
- Edge-of-grid reliability
Enabling incentives
- ARENA Advancing Renewables Programme
- AEMO System Strength Impact Assessment Guidelines (2023)
- Cheaper than reinforcing a 700 km single line
Broken Hill Battery
Additional background and problem context
Broken Hill sits at the far western edge of the Australian National Electricity Market, about 700 km from the nearest major generation, on one of the country’s weakest transmission systems. When large solar and wind farms connected nearby, the region developed system strength problems and unstable power swings, and generation had to be cut back. The battery was put here precisely because the grid is so weak.
Solution mechanism
Broken Hill sits far from any large spinning machine, so the battery has to hold the local grid up largely on its own. It can:
- Set grid’s voltage and frequency, no need for grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine
- Improve system strength, damp power oscillations and provide energy services and FCAS
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- One of Australia’s first grid-forming batteries
- Modelled to let 42 MW more wind and solar run nearby
- Testing confirmed it can damp the sub-synchronous oscillations limiting nearby generation
- A strong inertia response can cause voltage swings in a weak grid, so it settled on a low setting
- Supported the islanded area alongside other generation in October 2024, though its connection agreement required it to disconnect
- Had to leave grid-forming mode during faults to meet reactive current rules, since revised with lessons from projects like this one
Wallgrove Grid Battery
System operator:
AEMO
Manufacturer:
Tesla Energy
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Liddell and Vales Point coal closures
- Low system strength
- Low inertia
- Frequency stability
- Wind and solar integration
Enabling incentives
- ARENA Advancing Renewables Programme
- NSW Emerging Energy Programme
- Transgrid innovation programme
Wallgrove Grid Battery
Additional background and problem context
New South Wales knew it would lose inertia when the Liddell and Vales Point coal-fired power stations closed, and Transgrid, which owns the transmission network, had to find something to replace it. Wallgrove was the answer, and unusually it is owned by the network company itself, built to test whether a battery could supply inertia as a network service and still trade in the market.
Solution mechanism
Just under 5% of its storage is reserved for inertia and fast frequency response, so most of it remains available for trading. It can:
- Set grid’s voltage and frequency, no need for grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine, deliver FFR, improve system strength and provide FCAS
- Participate in energy arbitrage
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- Response to a frequency drop went from about 600 milliseconds to immediate
- In a real event it delivered more response than a generator overall, but less in the first fraction of a second, so Transgrid concluded inverter inertia is not a like-for-like substitute
- Combining network services with market trading took twelve contracts across four parties
- Provided inertia and FFR at nameplate about three-quarters of the time without restricting trading
Liddell Battery Energy Storage System
System operator:
AEMO
Manufacturer:
Fluence
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Inertia lost with the 2 GW coal plant on this site
- Low system strength
- Frequency stability
- Wind and solar integration
Enabling incentives
- ARENA 2022 Large Scale Battery Storage Funding Round
- AEMO System Strength Impact Assessment Guidelines (2023)
- LTESA through the New South Wales Electricity Infrastructure Roadmap
- Hunter Energy Hub redevelopment
Liddell Battery Energy Storage System
Additional background and problem context
The 2 GW Liddell coal-fired power station closed in 2023, taking with it one of the largest sources of inertia and system strength in New South Wales. The Wallgrove battery had already been built to cover part of that gap. Now a 500 MW grid-forming battery is being built on Liddell’s own site, as part of AGL’s redevelopment of it into an energy hub, to replace the services the coal plant used to provide.
Solution mechanism
Liddell is being built on the site of the coal plant it replaces, and at 500 MW it is meant to show that grid-forming works at the scale of the machines it stands in for. It will:
- Set the grid’s voltage and frequency, does not need a grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine
- Deliver FFR
- Improve system strength
- Provide FCAS
- Participate in energy arbitrage
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- Designed to show that a battery can supply inertia, system strength and voltage support at utility scale
- Will develop engineering practice for designing, tuning, testing, and commissioning batteries this size
- Will publish reports covering planning, design, procurement, construction and commissioning
- Will show whether a retiring coal site can be turned into a stability asset
Victorian Big Battery
System operator:
AEMO
Manufacturer:
Tesla Energy
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Built for interconnector transfer, not stability
- Low system strength
- Inertia shortfall expected as coal plants close
- Frequency stability
- Renewable integration
Enabling incentives
- Grant through Australian Renewable Energy Agency’s 2022 Large Scale Battery Storage Funding Round
- Existing Victorian Big Battery operating platform
- AEMO System Strength Impact Assessment Guidelines (2023)
Victorian Big Battery
Additional background and problem context
The Victorian Big Battery was not built for stability. It was built in 2021 to increase the amount of power that can flow between Victoria and New South Wales, and is contracted to do this in the summer. While most grid-forming battery projects are built that way from the start, this battery was retrofitted to be grid-forming.
Solution mechanism
The batteries and inverters stay in place. Grid-forming is added through control software, new protection equipment and metering, and the studies to prove it is safe. Once enabled, it will:
- Set grid’s voltage and frequency, no need for grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine, deliver FFR, improve system strength and provide FCAS
- Participate in energy arbitrage
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- Shows what’s needed to convert an operating battery rather than build a new one. Inverters already support GFM, but enabling it requires renegotiating connection conditions with network and market operators
- No new hardware was expected, but site protection had to be upgraded to clear arc faults safely, while frequency control moved from individual inverters to site controller, requiring new substation metering
- Plant keeps its SIPS role throughout, with settings rolled back between test stages to avoid interrupting this crucial function
- Retrofit was harder as the connection agreement requires reactive current to be measured at the connection point, not the inverters
Melbourne Renewable Energy Hub
System operator:
AEMO
Manufacturer:
Tesla Energy
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Sits on a 500 kV node linking three states
- Low system strength
- Inertia shortfall as Yallourn and Loy Yang close
- Frequency stability
- Coal plant retirement
- Renewable integration
Enabling incentives
- Victorian renewable transition
- AEMO System Strength Impact Assessment Guidelines (2023)
Melbourne Renewable Energy Hub
Additional background and problem context
Victoria is preparing to retire its large coal-fired power stations along with the stability services they provide, including Yallourn and Loy Yang. The battery sits at a 500 kV substation where the links to New South Wales and South Australia meet, so what happens there affects three states. It was built to hold that point steady as well as to store energy.
Solution mechanism
At 600 MW this is the largest grid-forming battery operating in Australia, and it sits at one of the most heavily used points on the national grid. It can:
- Set the grid’s voltage and frequency, does not need a grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine
- Deliver FFR
- Improve system strength
- Provide FCAS
- Participate in energy arbitrage
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- Australia’s largest operational grid-forming battery, at 600 MW, comparable to a coal unit
- Holds a 500 kV node where three state networks meet
Föhren Grid-Forming Battery (SUREVIVE project)
System operator:
Westnetz, Amprion
Manufacturer:
SMA
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- No local black start capability
- Low system strength
- Low inertia
- Frequency stability
Enabling incentives
- SUREVIVE research project, funded by the German economics ministry
- Commercial market participation alongside research
Föhren Grid-Forming Battery (SUREVIVE project)
Additional background and problem context
Almost all grid-forming batteries connect to the high-voltage transmission grid with only a few on distribution networks. That matters in Germany, where a growing share of generation connects at distribution level and the machines that used to hold the system steady are closing. Föhren was built to earn money on the energy market and to test whether a battery can hold up a distribution grid and restart it.
Solution mechanism
Föhren is connected straight into a substation on the distribution network, which is what lets it restart a section of that network on its own. It can:
- Set the grid’s voltage and frequency, does not need a grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine
- Support frequency regulation
- Improve voltage stability
- Support black start of a local section of the network
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- One of the first grid-forming batteries operating in a European distribution grid
- First field tests confirmed it behaves as modelled, including during demanding system events
- Delivers the same instant reserve as a conventional power plant
- Runs commercially on the energy market while serving as a research platform
- Runs to 2028, and will publish a best-practice guide for connecting and operating grid-forming inverters in distribution networks
Baolin Solar PV Grid-Forming Station
System operator:
State Grid
Manufacturer:
Sungrow
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Wind and solar already meet most of local demand
- Surplus cannot be exported to neighbouring regions
- No islanding or black-start capability
- No way to run the local grid independently
- Need for inertia, frequency, and voltage support
Enabling incentives
- Hubei provincial renewable capacity target of 41% by 2030
- Guangshui county-level 100% renewable demonstration project
- State Grid Hubei research and development programme
- National carbon peaking and neutrality goals
Baolin Solar PV Grid-Forming Station
Additional background and problem context
Suizhou has about 2,950 MW of wind and solar but only around 850 MW of local demand, and increasingly less room to export the surplus. The Baolin solar station, built in 2016, is part of a project to run the county of Guangshui on renewables alone, serving more than 200,000 people. To do that, its inverters were retrofitted to hold up the grid themselves, with no battery added.
Solution mechanism
About 60% of the station’s 50 MW of inverters, 27 in all, were converted to grid-forming control. Because there is no battery, the plant holds back a little of its solar output so it has something in reserve. It can:
- Set grid’s voltage and frequency, no need for grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine, switch seamlessly between grid-following and grid-forming operation, supply reactive power, form an electrical island and support black start
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- Confirms grid-forming is achievable through inverter control alone, with no battery. Voltage fluctuations fell from ~15% to ~2% of nominal after switching to GFM, according to Sungrow
- Islanded operation was verified through independent tests on the 110 kV network, including black start, with the plant able to start a microgrid and supply load unaided
- Achieved as a retrofit via inverter hardware and software, without replacing the plant. The neighbouring Yingzizhai wind farm also ran GFM at the same time (China’s first without a battery) so solar and wind both acted as voltage sources in the same system.
- Results published in peer-reviewed literature by State Grid Hubei Electric Power Research Institute
Gêrzê Grid-Forming Battery
System operator:
State Grid Tibet Electric Power
Manufacturer:
Huawei Digital Power
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Weak grid limits solar export to 1.5 MW of 30 MW
- Over 95 percent of output curtailed
- High share of renewables and power electronics
- Extreme site conditions for the equipment
Enabling incentives
- Revenue from solar that would otherwise be curtailed
Gêrzê Grid-Forming Battery
Additional background and problem context
Gêrzê sits at 4,600 metres in western Tibet, on a grid that is both remote and weak. The solar plant was built at 30 MW but allowed to export only 1.5 MW, so most of its output was wasted. The battery is not there to shift energy in time. It is there to make the grid strong enough to accept the solar already built. Running it in grid-forming mode raised the export limit to 12 MW.
Solution mechanism
Only the battery runs in grid-forming mode. The solar PV keeps its standard inverters and gains from the stability the battery provides. The storage is split into many small units that work together. It can:
- Set the grid's voltage and frequency, does not need a grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine
- Inject fast reactive power to hold voltage steady
- Damp oscillations across a wide frequency range
- Improve system strength so the grid accepts more solar
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- Export limit rose from 1.5 MW to 12 MW once the battery ran grid-forming
- Stayed connected through a staged 35 kV short circuit run by State Grid Tibet, reacting in a hundredth of a second
- Vendor reports no trips in more than 30 disturbances
- Weak grids can host more solar without new lines
- Grid-forming inverters held their overcurrent capability at 4,600 metres, where thin air derates power electronics
Golmud Grid-Forming Battery
System operator:
State Grid
Manufacturer:
Huawei Digital Power
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Coordinating wind, solar PV, solar thermal and storage
- Low system strength
- Low inertia
- High wind and solar penetration
Enabling incentives
- China’s New Power System initiative
- Qinghai renewable energy strategy
Golmud Grid-Forming Battery
Additional background and problem context
Golmud sits in a remote part of Qinghai, with an enormous concentration of wind and solar on a weak transmission network. The site combines wind, solar, solar thermal and a battery in one coordinated plant, rarely built on one site. The battery was made grid-forming to set the voltage and frequency the rest of the plant follows, and the site was chosen deliberately, because the network there is weak.
Solution mechanism
The battery is the grid-forming part of a plant that also has wind, solar and solar thermal behind it, so it has to hold steady a mix of very different generators. It can:
- Set the grid’s voltage and frequency, does not need a grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine
- Support frequency regulation
- Provide fast reactive power support
- Improve system strength
- Give wind and solar a stable local reference
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- More than 600 inverters worked together stably through severe faults
- Completed the 35 kV and 110 kV short-circuit tests on a utility-scale grid-forming battery
- Ran alongside wind, solar PV, and solar thermal without interference
- Reactive power support during transmission faults was confirmed in testing
Immingham B OCGT / Synchronous Condenser
System operator:
NESO
Manufacturer:
Siemens Energy (turbine) / SSS Gears (clutch)
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Peaking plants sit idle most of the year
- Low inertia
- Low system strength
- Stability constraints
- Stability limits cap how much renewables can run
Enabling incentives
- 15-year Capacity Market contract for the OCGT
- Stability services not yet contracted, market expected
- Sited alongside the existing VPI Immingham combined heat and power plant
Immingham B OCGT / Synchronous Condenser
Additional background and problem context
As coal plants retire, Great Britain is losing the spinning machines that supplied inertia, fault current and voltage control. Gas peaking plants only run when the demand is high, so most of the year they contribute nothing to stability. Immingham B was built so that its generator can keep spinning with the grid even when the turbine is shut down and burning no fuel.
Solution mechanism
A synchronous self-shifting (SSS) clutch between the turbine and the generator disengages on its own when the turbine slows down. The generator keeps spinning with the grid, and the plant switches from producing power to supporting it. It can then:
- Provide physical inertia
- Supply fault current
- Improve system strength
- Supply reactive power to regulate voltage
- Support black start
- Return to generating power quickly when needed
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- First gas peaking plant in Great Britain designed to work as either a generator or a synchronous condenser
- Provides stability services without burning fuel
- Avoids having to build separate synchronous condensers
- Earns revenue from stability services as well as from generating
- Provides the same services as a grid-forming inverter, plus the fault current only a spinning machine can supply
- New gas plants are expected to be hydrogen ready. A clutch is the same kind of forward decision, and has to be designed in from the start
Moneypoint Synchronous Condenser
System operator:
EirGrid
Manufacturer:
Siemens Energy
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Coal closure removes Ireland's largest machines
- Low inertia
- Low system strength
- Voltage instability
- Reduced fault current
Enabling incentives
- Ireland Climate Action Plan
- Coal plant transition / repurpose
- EirGrid DS3 Programme
Moneypoint Synchronous Condenser
Additional background and problem context
Ireland has one of the highest wind shares in the world, and aims to run at times with 95% of demand met by inverter-based sources (SNSP). As conventional plants retire, it needs new sources of inertia, fault current and voltage support. At Moneypoint, ahead of the closure of its coal units, a synchronous condenser was installed with a flywheel to store extra rotational energy.
Solution mechanism
The machine spins without generating any electricity, and a large flywheel on the same shaft stores extra rotational energy, giving Ireland more inertia from one unit than a synchronous condenser can provide on its own. It can:
- Provide physical inertia, boosted by the flywheel
- Supply fault current
- mprove system strength
- Supply reactive power to regulate voltage
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- Largest flywheel integrated with a synchronous condenser in the world
- Helps raise Ireland's limit on non-synchronous generation (SNSP)
- Replaces the inertia and system strength the coal plant used to supply
- Shows how a retiring coal power plant can be turned into a stability asset
Ankerlig OCGT / Synchronous Condenser
System operator:
NTCSA
Manufacturer:
Siemens Energy / SSS Gears
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Regional voltage instability
- Long-distance transmission dependence
- Little local generation beyond Koeberg
- Peak capacity shortage
- Low system strength in the Western Cape
Enabling incentives
- 2005/06 Western Cape supply crisis
- Urgent capacity need for winter 2007 peaks
- Eskom new-build programme
Ankerlig OCGT / Synchronous Condenser
Additional background and problem context
The Western Cape draws most of its power over long lines from coal plants at the other end of the country, with little local generation beyond the Koeberg nuclear power station. Blackouts in 2005 and 2006 showed how exposed that left the region. Eskom needed peaking capacity quickly for the winter of 2007, and it also needed local voltage support at times when the turbines were not running.
Solution mechanism
Ankerlig has nine turbines totalling 1,338 MW, and four of them, 592 MW in all, have a clutch between turbine and generator. The synchronous self-shifting (SSS) clutch disconnects on its own when the turbine slows, leaving the generator spinning with the grid. Those four units can:
- Supply reactive power to regulate voltage
- Provide physical inertia and fault current
- Improve system strength
- Deliver these services without burning fuel
- Return to generating power quickly when needed
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- One of the earliest large-scale plants built to switch between generating and supporting the grid, nearly two decades before similar plants were built in Europe
- Nearly 20 years of operational experience with automatic clutch-based switching
- The sister station at Gourikwa was built to the same design at the same time, with clutches on three of its five units
- Avoids having to build separate synchronous condensers
- Shows that peaking plants can support the grid outside peak hours
Brindisi Nord Synchronous Condenser Conversion
System operator:
Terna
Manufacturer:
A2A
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Voltage instability in southern Italy
- Declining synchronous generation
- High wind and solar penetration
- Coal plant retirement
- Reduced reactive power resources
Enabling incentives
- Terna tender for voltage regulation services
- Treated as a minor change to an existing permit, not a new one
- Reuse of retired generator assets
Brindisi Nord Synchronous Condenser Conversion
Additional background and problem context
Southern Italy is losing the synchronous machines that used to hold voltage steady, as thermal plants close and wind and solar grow. The Brindisi Nord coal plant stopped generating in 2012 for economic reasons and sat idle. After winning a Terna tender for voltage regulation, A2A converted the generators of two of its units into synchronous condensers, and put them back into service in 2020.
Solution mechanism
Nothing new was built here. The coal plant’s own generators were left in place, disconnected from their turbines and reconnected to the grid, where they now spin without producing electricity. They can:
Supply reactive power to regulate voltage
Contribute fault current and inertia
Run with no fuel and no emissions
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
Shows that the generators of a retired coal plant can be reused for stability, rather than replaced
Voltage regulation procured competitively through a tender, rather than provided as a by-product of generation
A 50 MW battery has since been approved at the same site, alongside the condensers
Z’Mutt Grid-Forming Pumping Station
System operator:
Swissgrid
Manufacturer:
ABB / ČKD
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Converter-connected pumped hydro is typically grid-following
- Need for grid-forming sources beyond batteries
- Declining synchronous generation in Europe
- Limited flexibility of fixed-speed pumps
Enabling incentives
- EU Horizon 2020 XFLEX HYDRO project
- Grande Dixence modernisation programme
Z’Mutt Grid-Forming Pumping Station
Additional background and problem context
Hydropower has always been a source of stability, because its machines spin in step with the grid. Newer variable-speed units are different. They connect through power electronics, which gives them more flexibility but means they usually follow the grid rather than help hold it up. At Z’Mutt pumping station, one unit was rebuilt to form the grid instead.
Solution mechanism
All of the machine’s power flows through its converter, so the converter is what connects it to the grid. Controlling that converter differently is what makes the unit grid-forming. It can:
- Set the grid’s voltage and frequency, does not need a grid reference to operate
- Inject or absorb power quickly
- Switch quickly between pumping and generating
- Run across the machine’s full speed range
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- The best documented field demonstration of grid-forming control on a pumped storage unit
- Results validated through simulations and field tests, published by the XFLEX HYDRO consortium
- Full-size converters make grid-forming control possible, but it has to be deliberately implemented
- Converter-connected grid-forming pumped storage is still unproven beyond 5 MW pilot scale
Frades 2 Variable-Speed Pumped Storage
System operator:
REN
Manufacturer:
Voith
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Very high wind penetration in Portugal
- Need for fast, flexible balancing capacity
- Limited power regulation of fixed-speed pumps
- Grid-code demands during voltage dips
Enabling incentives
- REN grid-code requirements, including reactive current injection within 30 milliseconds during voltage drops
- EU Horizon 2020 XFLEX HYDRO demonstrator project
- Portuguese wind integration needs
Frades 2 Variable-Speed Pumped Storage
Additional background and problem context
Portugal has one of the highest wind shares in Europe, and needs plants that can balance it. Frades 2 can vary its power while pumping, not only while generating, unlike a conventional plant. It follows the grid rather than forming it, but it shows how much a modern pumped hydro plant can do within that limit.
Solution mechanism
The plant is 780 MW across two units. In pumping mode each unit can adjust its power by about ±45 MW, and by running pump and turbine together the plant can reach around 231 MW of frequency reserve. Each unit can deliver up to 110 MW within 1.3 seconds. It can:
- Adjust power while pumping, not only while generating
- Deliver fast active power and frequency response
- Inject reactive current within milliseconds during grid faults
- Optimise service provision through digital controls developed by EPFL
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- Shows how much a grid-following pumped hydro plant can contribute at commercial scale
- Hydraulic short circuit successfully field-tested at commercial scale
- Grid-following control is the limit, not the machine
- Grimsel 2 (2013) and Linth-Limmern (2016) show variable speed maturity across the Alps
Dersalloch Grid-Forming Wind Farm
System operator:
NESO
Manufacturer:
Siemens Gamesa
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Wind typically operates grid-following only
- Low inertia
- Black start dependence on fossil plants
- Declining synchronous generation in Great Britain
- Need for grid-forming sources beyond batteries
Enabling incentives
- Low Carbon Infrastructure Transition Programme
- Iberdrola/SPR innovation programme
- Great Britain stability and restoration strategy needs
Dersalloch Grid-Forming Wind Farm
Additional background and problem context
Wind turbines connect to the grid through converters, which normally follow the grid rather than help form it. Restarting a grid after a blackout has been a job for large synchronous plants. At Dersalloch, ScottishPower Renewables and Siemens Gamesa changed the control software across the whole wind farm, first to hold up an electrical island on its own, then to re-energise a section of network from a standing start.
Solution mechanism
Nothing was changed on the turbines themselves. Virtual synchronous machine (VSM) control was added in software across all of the farm’s turbines. They can:
- Set the grid’s voltage and frequency, does not need a grid reference to operate
- Provide an inertial response through VSM control
- Form a stable electrical island
- Re-energise part of the grid after a shutdown
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- VSM control deployed across a whole operating wind farm, after turbine-scale tests in 2017-18 and a de-risking trial in Denmark
- Largest grid-forming wind farm in the world at the time
- In 2020 it re-energised a section of transmission network, reported as a world first for wind
- Its response to real system events was published in peer-reviewed literature, which is rare field data for grid-forming wind
- Grid-forming was added through control software alone, with no change to the turbines themselves
- The farm went back to grid-following operation after the trials
Microsoft Dublin Grid-Interactive UPS
System operator:
EirGrid
Manufacturer:
Eaton
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Rapid data centre demand growth in Ireland
- High wind shares, need for FFR
- Reserve services provided by fossil plants
- Backup assets sitting idle in large loads
Enabling incentives
- EirGrid’s grid services market, which prioritises non-carbon-emitting solutions
- Aggregation through Enel X, enabling participation in the DS3 market
- Microsoft sustainability commitments
Microsoft Dublin Grid-Interactive UPS
Additional background and problem context
Data centres are usually discussed as a problem for Ireland’s grid, because they consume so much and are growing so fast. But every data centre already holds batteries for backup power, sitting idle most of the time. At its Dublin campus, Microsoft changed the controls on that backup system so the batteries would also respond when grid frequency moves, without losing their backup role.
Solution mechanism
The batteries were already there, installed to keep the servers running if the grid fails. The change was in the controls, which now let power flow out to the grid as well as in. They can:
- Deliver FFR within milliseconds
- Keep full backup protection for the site
- Take part in EirGrid’s market through Enel X’s virtual power plant
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- First data centre backup system to sell FFR to the grid
- Large loads can provide stability services using equipment they already have on site
- If systems like this replaced fossil-provided grid services across Ireland, around two million tonnes of CO2 could be avoided, roughly 20% of the power sector’s expected emissions
- This was only possible because DS3 was open to demand-side units and to aggregation
- The UPS responds to the grid rather than forming it. Grid-forming from loads is still a research topic, and this is the step before it
Dong-Su Grid-Forming Battery
System operator:
Inner Mongolia Power Group
Manufacturer:
Star Charge (Wanbang Digital Energy)
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Wind and solar capacity far exceeds local demand
- Limited capacity to export surplus power
- Low system strength
- Low inertia
Enabling incentives
- China’s renewable energy plan for 2020 to 2025
- Inner Mongolia new-type energy storage programme
- Regional targets for grid-forming equipment
Dong-Su Grid-Forming Battery
Additional background and problem context
DongSu sits in Inner Mongolia, where wind and solar have grown faster than local demand and there is limited capacity to export the surplus. The grid there needs both storage and stability. The station is made up of about 800 battery units across 28 hectares and was connected to the grid in August 2026 at the first attempt.
Solution mechanism
t 1,000 MW and 4,000 MWh, DongSu is large enough to hold up the local grid on its own while shifting surplus wind and solar. It can:
- Set the grid’s voltage and frequency, does not need a grid reference to operate
- Provide response imitating inertia of a synchronous machine
- Improve system strength
- Reduce curtailment of wind and solar
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- Four hours of storage at full power, enough to shift surplus wind and solar into the evening
- Expected to move around 1 TWh of electricity per year
- Connected at the first attempt, unusual at this size
- China has announced plans for more gigawatt-scale projects, pairing them with smarter grid-management software and improved generation forecasting
Provincetown Battery
System operator:
Eversource
Manufacturer:
SMA
Capacity
Year*
Location
Problem addressed
- Radially connected, so one fault cuts supply
- Exposed to storm outages on a single line
- No way to keep the Outer Cape supplied alone
- Local voltage falls at the end of a long feeder
Enabling incentives
- Utility-owned non-wires alternative
- Cheaper than building a second distribution line
Provincetown Battery
Additional background and problem context
The Outer Cape depended on a single 21 km distribution network supply path, which left Provincetown exposed to outages from storms and equipment failures. The conventional fix would have been to build a second distribution line. Eversource built a grid-forming battery instead, able to supply the local network on its own when the rest of the grid is unavailable.
Solution mechanism
The grid-forming battery can energise and operate the local distribution network as an islanded microgrid when the Outer Cape separates from the main grid. It can:
- Set voltage and frequency inside the island
- Supply local load during grid outages
- Provide local voltage support
- Reduce outage duration
- Support automated islanding and restoration
- Peak shave during grid-connected operation
- Resynchronise the microgrid to the grid
Lessons learned / performance demonstration
- The grid-forming battery can support an islanded network of roughly 10,000 customers
- Successfully demonstrated automatic islanding and restoration
- Successfully avoided building a second distribution line
- Provides both resilience and normal grid-support functions
- Supplied Provincetown and Truro for 42 minutes in May 2023, and nearly all of Provincetown for 2 hours 20 minutes in a December 2023 storm